Monday, October 20, 2008

Bacon's Rebellion

-----Bacon's Rebellion was a war brought onto innocent Natives, led by a man named Nathaniel Bacon who was very angry with the colony was being run. The government played a very large role in why this rebellion happened. The government was tricking and using not only all the Indians, but as well as their own colonists. When it comes to the topic of Bacon's Rebellion, most of us will readily agree that the people in charge of Virginia during the seventeenth century were the cause of the rebellion. Where this agreement usually comes to a end, however, is on the question of, Did Bacon even care about why he was killing Indians, or if that particular Indian had ever done anything wrong, or did he just want to kill all Indians. Whereas some are convinced that Bacon was a good person and the government was terrible, others still maintain that Bacon was only after gold, land and killing Indians. I see it as, the government was power hungry and just wanted to use, abuse and control everyone around them.
-----During Bacon’s rebellion in 1676 the government mistreated the Indians and the colonists and benefited from both of them. The government benefited greatly from trade with the Indians. They made a law that no one was allowed to do any kind of trading goods with any of the Indians. But secretly, the governor made special licenses for only a selective few to be allowed to trade with the Indians as long as he gets a part of the profit. Howard Zinn states in A Young People’s History of the United States, "And the whole colony, rich and poor, was being used by England" (p.39). According to the Virginia settlers their government was protecting the Indians from the colonists, instead of defending the colonists. The government sent back an Army of English when they went to fight the Indians. The government trying to protect them warned the Indians that Bacon was coming for them. They built forts in the woods to "protect" the colonists, but knew there was really no security for them, and then after they built the forts they taxed all the people in the colony for forts that gave them no fortification or security. “Bacon issued his 'Declaration of the People' on July 30, 1676 which stated that Berkeley was corrupt, played favorites and protected the Indians for his own selfish purposes. ("Nathaniel Bacon." 03-17-2003 paragraph 14. 16 Oct 2008 ). The people in command ignored the colonist’s complaints about the Indians behavior, the Indians were killing and robbing people, and the governor still didn't take any notice. The governor didn't believe the colonist's accusations. Berkeley publicly named Bacon a traitor, and refused to sign a promised commission. A letter from Elizabeth Bacon to her sister "[T]he Indians killing the people daily, the governor not taking notice of it for to hinder them, but let them daily do all the mischief they can" (document #9).
-----The colonists were very mistreated by the English government during Bacon's rebellion. They had to deal with very little or lack of freedom. Indentured servants were bought and sold like slaves. Poor people signed an agreement to be slaves for five to seven years."Grantham found four hundred armed whites and blacks- freeman, servants, and slaves. He promised to pardon them and to free the servants and slaves. Instead, he turned his boat's guns on the rebels and took their weapons. Then he returned the servants and slaves to their masters" (p.38 Zinn). The government had really high taxes put onto the colonists. There was a huge gap between the rich and poor. The rich built mansions, while the poor struggled to survive. They had unfair taxes that were way too high, and were dealing with unemployment and poverty. Colonists grew tobacco, while the king was making a huge profit. "Bacon accused the Berkeley government of wrongdoing, including unfair taxes and not protecting the western farmers from the Indians" (p39 Zinn). Laws made by the government affected the colonists in a negative way. The government was protecting the Indians. They made restrictions for the colonists dealing with their rights to vote. Changes in land laws caused farmers to homelessness. New laws passed to punish poor, imprison them and send them to America.
"The revolt changed little within the colony; gentlemen continued to monopolize the best land, the highest offices, and the most slaves. The Indians suffered the most. Those within the colony lost population and land" ("US Military History Companion: Bacon's Rebellion ." paragraph 4. 14 Oct 2008 ).
-----The Indians were the ones who suffered the worst from the English government. They had to deal with the English intruding onto their land, and were forced to live on predestined English land. "By the late seventeenth century, many Indian groups in the British colonies had fallen into a subordinate, 'tributary status', living on assigned lands at the will and direction of the provincial governments" (p.76 Puglisi). The government took everything away from the Indians including their freedom. The Indians were alienated and distrusted. They thought the government was on their side; really they were only using them to take advantage of the trade. New Virginia laws made slavery lifelong and inherited by one's children. "The colonial governments agreed among themselves that servants who escaped from one colony to another must be returned" (p.42 Zinn).The worst of the horrible mistreatment towards the Indians was violence. The Indians were forced to be slaves and servants. The Indians who had peace treaties were even killed, as well as the Indians were who Christianized. The Government was using Indians as their spies. Beatings and whippings were common, Servant women were raped" (p42 Zinn).
-----During the whole rebellion, up until the day Bacon died, he and Governor Berkeley had never ending war between themselves. Some people believe Berkeley was the bad guy, others believe just the opposite. Bacon helped the colonists stand up for themselves during the seventeenth century; he was only in the colony for three years and was made one of the council members. Bacon had great respect from most if not all the colonists. But unfortunately, he did kill some of the Indians who were friends to Berkeley and his people.Berkeley had Bacon arrested for disobeying the government and leading an illegal war against the Indians. "Before he had been three years in the colony, he was, for his extraordinary Qualifications, made one of the council. And in great honor and esteem among the people" (document 11). "Mr. Bacon nor any with him had injured any English man in their persons or estates, and that the country was generally well pleased with what they had done, and she believed most of the council also" (document 14). Berkeley failed to defend and protect his people. He did not do his part to protect the colonists from native attacks, fled from bacon and his followers during the war. Bacon and Berkeley fought over loyal servants and small landowners. Berkeley hung two dozen men and took their estates who were Bacon's followers. "Berkeley's arbitrary rule and unjust taxation, his neglect of an an adequate Indian defense; etc. these we humbly confess, were the greatest seducements that provoked most of us at first to take up arms but only against the... barbarous enemies the Indians" (document 35).

3 comments:

alysters said...

Great sentence use and structure ;)
i really like your quotes; they fit the purpose you are trying to make.

-i would suggest to start of with a background to give a reader a sense of what has happened and what is happening. (just a suggestion)
:) great ending quote. (you can also add your opinion after that. but i would suggest not to use "i believe or I think"... but sound as if you were the 3rd person speaking. :)

other than that, you have a great rough draft ! :)

Casey said...

-first sentence should say "with the WAY the colony was being run."
-i think that there is a little too much I say in the background of why the rebellion happenned, but the thesis is fine.
-"They made a law that no one was allowed to do any kind of trading goods with any of the Indians." Is there proof?
-"The government sent back an Army of English when they went to fight the Indians. The government trying to protect them warned the Indians that Bacon was coming for them." This is contradictory. did you mean that bacon was coming for them and the government warned them? Also, make a point that Bacon was attacking w/o a permit to.
-"New laws passed to punish poor, imprison them and send them to America." why is this a bad thing?
-"The Indians were the ones who suffered the worst from the English government. They had to deal with the English intruding onto their land, and were forced to live on predestined English land." Wasnt this because of the colonist encroaching on their land and the government wouldnt take land they had given the indians?contradicts thesis
-"The Indians were forced to be slaves and servants" where is your proof?


Overall, i see almost no proof of the claims you are making and how they relate to your thesis. I also see practically no I SAY other than your actual thesis. This may make a good THEY SAY, but there is no I SAY or how it affects today. Also i see there is a conclusion, but it seems to be mixed in with multiple facts and quotes that are a little irrelevant to be in a conclusion.

Rylee Kettner said...

I really like how your paper flows. There are a few spelling and grammar mistakes, but its a rough draft so I am pretty sure everybody has some lol. I liked how you used the templates, they didnt stick out, they just flowed into the rest of your paper. I also think you used just the right amount of quotes to back up yoru argument. The only big problem I had was there was no real distinction between the "They Say" and "I say", it all just seemed mixed together. Other than that I really like it. Good job!